Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2016-2017Tennessee
Jeff George
WR • 6'6" • 198 lbs • Leavenworth, KS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jeff George reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.3
Consistency
37.8
Season Value
54.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
1617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff George, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tennessee. Jeff George reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 180 primary output with 73.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
25.7
Efficiency
73.3
Usage
8.3
Consistency
37.8
Best Game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 28. Massachusetts: 6. Georgia: 7. Kentucky: 59. Missouri: 5. LSU: 60. Vanderbilt: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 93.3. Massachusetts: 1 by 40. Georgia: 1 by 46.7. Kentucky: 2 by 100. Missouri: 1 by 33.3. LSU: 1 by 100. Vanderbilt: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses29.2 · n=5
First Half25 · n=4 · -1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half26.7 · n=3 · +1.7 vs First Half
All Games25.7 · n=7
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Tennessee | 20 | 100 | 4.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tennessee | 180 | 73.3 | 8.3 | 160 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Primary metric
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
20
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
28
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Vanderbilt
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
180 primary output · 73.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
54.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tennessee
53.9
20 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
200
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.