Usage Score
11.5
Player Dossier
2018-2020UAB
LB • 6'7" • 255 lbs • Lithonia, GA, USA
Jordan Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.5
Efficiency
36.7
Consistency
36.9
Season Value
29
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Smith, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · UAB. Jordan Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.7 disruption score.
Jordan Smith played LB for UAB. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jordan Smith recorded 94 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
UAB paired 28 primary output with 35.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 36.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
36.7
Usage
11.5
Consistency
36.9
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Miami: 2. South Alabama: 3. UTSA: 3. Western Kentucky: 1. Louisiana: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0.5. Rice: 5. Marshall: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Miami: 9 by 57.5. South Alabama: 4 by 46.7. UTSA: 2 by 38.3. Western Kentucky: 1 by 14.2. Louisiana: 5 by 30.8. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 34.2. Rice: 7 by 79.2. Marshall: 6 by 25
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | @ Marshall | W 22-13 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/12 | @ Rice2+ sacks · Splash game | W 21-16 | 7 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 34-37 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Louisiana | L 20-24 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Western Kentucky | W 37-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | vs UTSA | W 21-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/24 | @ South AlabamaSplash game | W 42-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/11 | @ MiamiSplash game | L 14-31 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Postseason | UAB | 28 | 35.5 | 12.4 | 28 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UAB | 28 | 35.5 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UAB | 15.5 | 36.7 | 11.5 | -12.5 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.4 takeover score.
#2
UTSA
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56.9 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.4 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
#5
Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · UAB
28 primary output · 35.5 efficiency · 12.4 usage
43.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · UAB
43.1
28 primary · 35.5 efficiency · 12.4 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · UAB
29
15.5 primary · 36.7 efficiency · 11.5 usage
1
Impact games
8
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7597
Prentiss Senior · Prentiss, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
94
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.