Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Player Dossier
2016-2021Illinois
TE • 6'4" • 230 lbs • Jackson, NE, USA
Branden Hohenstein reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
Reliability
—
Reliability sample still building
Star Power
85
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Nebraska
Snapshot
Branden Hohenstein, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Nebraska. Branden Hohenstein reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2021 Regular Season | Illinois | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Branden Hohenstein is listed as a TE for Nebraska and Illinois. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nebraska, Illinois.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
0
Receiving Yards / G
—
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
—
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 61. Virginia: 22
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nebraska
2016-2017
Opening stop
Illinois
2021
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Illinois | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Mississippi State
Week 13
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Army
Week 5
61
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Virginia
Week 12
22
Receiving Yards
36.4 takeover
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ North Texas
Week 1
11
Receiving Yards
23.1 takeover
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Nebraska
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
—
#2
2017 Regular Season · Nebraska
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Illinois
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.