Usage Score
9.2
Player Dossier
2016-2021Minnesota
Coney Durr
DB • 5'10" • 200 lbs • Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Coney Durr shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.9
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
28.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Minnesota
16161718181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 10
- Program Path
- Minnesota
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Coney Durr, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Minnesota. Coney Durr shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Minnesota paired 12 primary output with 22.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Minnesota
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
20.9
Usage
9.2
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 1. Ohio State: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Colorado: 1. Bowling Green: 1. Purdue: 2. Nebraska: 0. Maryland: 2.5. Northwestern: 1. Illinois: 0. Iowa: 0. Indiana: 1. Wisconsin: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 2 by 18.3. Ohio State: 3 by 22.5. Miami (OH): 2 by 8.3. Colorado: 2 by 18.3. Bowling Green: 4 by 26.7. Purdue: 7 by 49.2. Nebraska: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 3 by 37.5. Northwestern: 4 by 26.7. Illinois: 2 by 8.3. Iowa: 2 by 8.3. Indiana: 0 by 10. Wisconsin: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=9 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=4 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=6 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/29 | vs West Virginia | W 18-6 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Wisconsin | W 23-13 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Indiana | W 35-14 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Iowa | L 22-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Illinois | L 6-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Northwestern | W 41-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Maryland | W 34-16 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Nebraska | W 30-23 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Purdue | W 20-13 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Bowling Green | L 10-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Colorado | W 30-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Miami (OH) | W 31-26 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Ohio State | L 31-45 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Minnesota
2016-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172018201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Minnesota | 1 | 11.7 | 1.5 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Minnesota | 1 | 11.7 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Minnesota | 12 | 22.3 | 9.8 | 12 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Minnesota | 12 | 22.3 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Minnesota | 12 | 21.5 | 3.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Minnesota | 12 | 21.5 | 3.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Minnesota | 6 | 26.7 | 7.8 | -6 |
| 2021 Postseason | Minnesota | 10.5 | 20.9 | 9.2 | 4.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Minnesota | 10.5 | 20.9 | 9.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.2 takeover score.
#2
Northwestern
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.8 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#4
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.2 takeover score.
#5
Ohio State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Minnesota
12 primary output · 22.3 efficiency · 9.8 usage
29.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Minnesota
29.6
12 primary · 22.3 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Minnesota
29.6
12 primary · 21.5 efficiency · 3.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8478
Southaven · Southaven, MS
- Committed To
- Arkansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
10
Seasons tracked
136
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.