Usage Score
4.6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Ohio State
Chris Booker
WR • 6'2" • 190 lbs • Saint Louis, MO, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Booker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.7
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
48.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Ohio State
171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Booker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Ohio State. Chris Booker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
5.4
Efficiency
86.7
Usage
4.6
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 0. Tulsa: 0. Akron: 16. Indiana: 11. Purdue: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins5.4 · n=5
First Half5.3 · n=3 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half5.5 · n=2 · +0.2 vs First Half
All Games5.4 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Ohio State | 27 | 86.7 | 4.6 | 27 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio State | 27 | 86.7 | 4.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16
Primary metric
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Utah
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Ohio State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2021 Postseason · Ohio State
48.6
27 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 4.6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Ohio State
48.6
27 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
27
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.