Usage Score
16.6
Player Dossier
2019-2019Texas State
QB • 6'2" • 225 lbs • Auburn, WA, USA
Gresch Jensen is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
16.6
Efficiency
53.5
Consistency
72.7
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gresch Jensen, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas State. Gresch Jensen is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Texas State paired 1,242 primary output with 53.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 53.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Primary Metric / G
177.4
Efficiency
53.5
Usage
16.6
Consistency
72.7
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 162. Wyoming: 360. SMU: 150. Georgia State: 159. Unknown: 254. UL Monroe: 157. App State: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 33 by 47.9. Wyoming: 60 by 51.8. SMU: 43 by 47.6. Georgia State: 31 by 64.3. Unknown: 33 by 59.3. UL Monroe: 34 by 50.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
64.3 vs Georgia State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | @ App State | L 13-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 10/11 | vs UL Monroe | L 14-24 | 16 | 30 | 170 | 53.3 | 0 | 0 | 50.1 | 4 | -13 | -3.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 22 | 29 | 253 | 75.9 | 2 | 1 | 59.3 | 4 | 1 | 0.30 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Georgia State | W 37-34 | 16 | 25 | 129 | 64.0 | 0 | 0 | 64.3 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ SMU | L 17-47 | 22 | 37 | 185 | 59.5 | 1 | 1 | 47.6 | 6 | -35 | -5.80 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Wyoming300-yard game | L 14-23 | 33 | 54 | 394 | 61.1 | 1 | 2 | 51.8 | 6 | -34 | -5.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 7-41 | 20 | 31 | 160 | 64.5 | 1 | 2 | 47.9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas State
2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas State | 1,242 | 53.5 | 16.6 | — |
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
360
Primary metric
360 total offense with 51.8 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
254
Primary metric
Game with 254 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency.
254 total offense with 59.3 efficiency.
#3
Georgia State
159
Primary metric
Win with 159 yards of offense and 64.3 efficiency.
159 total offense with 64.3 efficiency.
#4
SMU
150
Primary metric
Loss with 150 yards of offense and 47.6 efficiency.
150 total offense with 47.6 efficiency.
#5
UL Monroe
157
Primary metric
Loss with 157 yards of offense and 50.1 efficiency.
157 total offense with 50.1 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Texas State
1,242 primary output · 53.5 efficiency · 16.6 usage
60.5
2
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
1
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
1,242
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Gresch Jensen quick answers