Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Toledo
Kahlil Robinson
DB • 6'1" • 181 lbs • Charlotte, NC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kahlil Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
23.4
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
13
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Toledo
161717181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kahlil Robinson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Toledo. Kahlil Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Toledo paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 23.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
23.4
Usage
6
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Colorado State: 1. BYU: 2. Western Michigan: 3. Bowling Green: 0. Ball State: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Kent State: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Buffalo: 0. Central Michigan: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 25. Colorado State: 5 by 30.8. BYU: 4 by 36.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 42.5. Bowling Green: 3 by 12.5. Ball State: 4 by 16.7. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 35. Kent State: 4 by 16.7. Northern Illinois: 6 by 25. Buffalo: 2 by 8.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=5 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=5 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half1 · n=6 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · n=5 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Central Michigan | L 7-49 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/21 | @ Buffalo | L 30-49 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/14 | vs Northern Illinois | L 28-31 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/6 | vs Kent State | W 35-33 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 37-34 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ball State | L 14-52 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Bowling Green | L 7-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Western Michigan | W 31-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs BYU | W 28-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Colorado State | W 41-35 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 9 | 26.4 | 6.4 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 9 | 26.4 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 2 | 23.7 | 3.8 | -7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 2 | 23.7 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 7 | 23.4 | 6 | 5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#2
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.6 takeover score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#4
Western Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.7 takeover score.
#5
Buffalo
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35
#2
2017 Postseason · Toledo
22.2
9 primary · 26.4 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
22.2
9 primary · 26.4 efficiency · 6.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
182
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.