Usage Score
22.8
Player Dossier
2015-2018Toledo
Diontae Johnson
WR • 5'11" • 181 lbs • Ruskin, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Diontae Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.2
Consistency
63.9
Season Value
56.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo
15151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Diontae Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo. Diontae Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Toledo paired 1,278 primary output with 90.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
58.5
Efficiency
80.2
Usage
22.8
Consistency
63.9
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 98. Unknown: 60. Miami: 119. Nevada: 67. Fresno State: 21. Bowling Green: 26. Eastern Michigan: 44. Buffalo: 97. Western Michigan: 49. Ball State: 100. Northern Illinois: 52. Kent State: 16. Central Michigan: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 6 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Miami: 6 by 100. Nevada: 4 by 100. Fresno State: 3 by 46.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 57.8. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 73.3. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Western Michigan: 4 by 81.7. Ball State: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 7 by 49.5. Kent State: 2 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins45 · n=6 · -26.8 vs Losses
Losses71.8 · n=6 · +26.8 vs Wins
First Half62.1 · n=7 · +7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half54.3 · n=6 · -7.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/21 | vs Florida International | L 32-35 | — | 6 | 98 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central Michigan | W 51-13 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Kent State | W 56-34 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 11/8 | @ Northern Illinois | L 15-38 | — | 7 | 52 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards | W 45-13 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 57 |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Western Michigan | W 51-24 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Buffalo | L 17-31 | — | 2 | 97 | 48.5 | 48.50 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 26-28 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Bowling Green | W 52-36 | — | 3 | 26 | 8 | 8.70 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Fresno State | L 27-49 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nevada | W 63-44 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 24-49 | — | 6 | 119 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 48 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 237 | 81.9 | 7.6 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 237 | 81.9 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | -237 |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 1,278 | 90.2 | 27.4 | 1,278 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,278 | 90.2 | 27.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 761 | 80.2 | 22.8 | -517 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 761 | 80.2 | 22.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170
Primary metric
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
166
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio
144
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Toledo
1,278 primary output · 90.2 efficiency · 27.4 usage
70.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
70.8
1,278 primary · 90.2 efficiency · 27.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Toledo
56.5
761 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 22.8 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,276
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.