Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Louisiana Tech
S • 5'11" • 210 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Darryl Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.3
Efficiency
21.5
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
11.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darryl Lewis, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Darryl Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 7 primary output with 28.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
21.5
Usage
4.3
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. Texas: 0. Unknown: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Florida International: 0. Rice: 1. Massachusetts: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTEP: 0. North Texas: 0. Marshall: 0. UAB: 1. UTSA: 2
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 1 by 14.2. Texas: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Bowling Green: 2 by 8.3. Florida International: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 5 by 30.8. Massachusetts: 2 by 8.3. Southern Miss: 6 by 25. UTEP: 1 by 4.2. North Texas: 5 by 20.8. Marshall: 7 by 29.2. UAB: 13 by 60. UTSA: 4 by 36.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
60 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | @ Miami | W 14-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs UTSA | W 41-27 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ UAB10+ tackles | L 14-20 | 13 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Marshall | L 10-31 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs North Texas | W 52-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 42-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Southern Miss | W 45-30 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Massachusetts | W 69-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Rice | W 23-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Florida International | W 43-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Bowling Green | W 35-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Texas | L 14-45 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana Tech
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 12.9 | 2.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 12.9 | 2.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 18.3 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 18.3 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 7 | 28.3 | 6.2 | 2 |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 21.5 | 4.3 | -2 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 21.5 | 4.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
#2
Rice
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49 takeover score.
#3
UTSA
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
#4
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
7 primary output · 28.3 efficiency · 6.2 usage
15.4
#2
2017 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
11.2
5 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
11.2
5 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 5.3 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
178
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Darryl Lewis quick answers