Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2015-2018Rutgers
Blessuan Austin
DB • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Queens, NY, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Blessuan Austin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 52.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
52.5
Consistency
100
Season Value
44.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blessuan Austin, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Rutgers. Blessuan Austin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 52.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 4 primary output with 52.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 52.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
1
Havoc Plays / G
4
Efficiency
52.5
Usage
17
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/1 | vs Texas StateSplash game | W 35-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 17 | 31.4 | 3.8 | 16 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rutgers | 2 | 17.5 | 4.3 | -15 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rutgers | 4 | 52.5 | 17 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.2 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Texas State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.5 takeover score.
#4
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.8 takeover score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
4 primary output · 52.5 efficiency · 17 usage
44.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
40.8
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
28
17 primary · 31.4 efficiency · 3.8 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
57
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.