Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2015-2018Indiana
DB • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Largo, FL, USA
Jonathan Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.7
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
40.2
Season Value
22.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Indiana
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Crawford, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Indiana. Jonathan Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Indiana paired 4 primary output with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
6.7
Consistency
40.2
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 1. Virginia: 0. Ball State: 3. Michigan State: 1. Rutgers: 1. Ohio State: 0. Iowa: 0. Penn State: 0. Minnesota: 0. Maryland: 0. Michigan: 1. Purdue: 1.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 3 by 22.5. Virginia: 7 by 29.2. Ball State: 5 by 50.8. Michigan State: 9 by 47.5. Rutgers: 3 by 22.5. Ohio State: 6 by 25. Iowa: 2 by 8.3. Penn State: 7 by 29.2. Minnesota: 6 by 25. Maryland: 8 by 33.3. Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Purdue: 6 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Purdue | L 21-28 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Michigan | L 20-31 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Maryland | W 34-32 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Minnesota | L 31-38 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Penn State | L 28-33 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Iowa | L 16-42 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Ohio State | L 26-49 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Rutgers | W 24-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Michigan State | L 21-35 | 9 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Ball StateSplash game | W 38-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Virginia | W 20-16 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Florida International | W 38-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Indiana | 4 | 26.7 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Indiana | 4 | 26.7 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Indiana | 10.5 | 31.2 | 5.4 | 6.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Indiana | 10.5 | 31.2 | 5.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Indiana | 12 | 31.2 | 5.4 | 1.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Indiana | 8.5 | 30.3 | 6.7 | -3.5 |
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Ball State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#3
Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.2 takeover score.
#4
Northwestern
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Indiana
4 primary output · 26.7 efficiency · — usage
30
#2
2015 Regular Season · Indiana
30
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · — usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Indiana
28.9
12 primary · 31.2 efficiency · 5.4 usage
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9542
Findlay · Findlay, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
200
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jonathan Crawford quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit