Usage Score
19.1
Player Dossier
2015-2017South Carolina
Hayden Hurst
TE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Hayden Hurst reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.2
Consistency
61.6
Season Value
62.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina
1516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- South Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hayden Hurst, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina. Hayden Hurst reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Carolina paired 616 primary output with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · South Carolina
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
43
Efficiency
69.2
Usage
19.1
Consistency
61.6
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 41. NC State: -2. Missouri: 69. Kentucky: 39. Louisiana Tech: 39. Texas A&M: 76. Arkansas: 76. Tennessee: 0. Vanderbilt: 31. Georgia: 93. Florida: 59. Unknown: 10. Clemson: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 3 by 91.1. NC State: 1 by 0. Missouri: 3 by 100. Kentucky: 4 by 65. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 86.7. Texas A&M: 6 by 84.4. Arkansas: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 4 by 51.7. Georgia: 7 by 88.6. Florida: 5 by 78.7. Unknown: 3 by 22.2. Clemson: 3 by 62.2
Split Comparison
Wins39.1 · n=8 · -19.9 vs Losses
Losses59 · n=4 · +19.9 vs Wins
First Half48.3 · n=7 · +11.5 vs Second Half
Second Half36.8 · n=6 · -11.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Michigan | W 26-19 | — | 3 | 41 | 7 | 13.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Clemson | L 10-34 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 10 | 2.8 | 3.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Florida | W 28-20 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.7 | 11.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Georgia | L 10-24 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Vanderbilt | W 34-27 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.4 | 7.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tennessee | W 15-9 | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Arkansas | W 48-22 | — | 2 | 76 | 22 | 38 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-24 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 17-16 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Kentucky | L 13-23 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Missouri | W 31-13 | — | 3 | 69 | 17.8 | 23 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs NC State | W 35-28 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Carolina
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | South Carolina | 106 | 65.3 | 9 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | South Carolina | 616 | 77.4 | 19 | 510 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Carolina | 616 | 77.4 | 19 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | South Carolina | 559 | 69.2 | 19.1 | -57 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Carolina | 559 | 69.2 | 19.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 88.6 efficiency score.
#3
Kentucky
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · South Carolina
616 primary output · 77.4 efficiency · 19 usage
63.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · South Carolina
63.9
616 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 19 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · South Carolina
62.2
559 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 19.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,281
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.