Usage / Role
49%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2019UTSA
CB • 5'9" • 185 lbs • Arlington, TX, USA
Cassius Grady shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.4 disruption score.
Usage / Role
49%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
77
High-end production for a corner
Reliability
64
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
80
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
Cassius Grady built his college career from 2015 through 2019 as a cornerback from Arlington, TX wearing No. 28, spending time with Northern Illinois and UTSA. The clearest part of Cassius Grady's career was his...
Read the storyCassius Grady, CB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA. Cassius Grady shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.4 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 45 | 3.5 | 0 | - | 5 | 0 | 53.1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 36 | 4 | 1 | - | 7 | 0 | 54.9 |
Related Context
Cassius Grady played CB for Northern Illinois and UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cassius Grady recorded 81 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UTSA paired 14 primary output with 26.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Northern Illinois, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
26.4
Usage
5.3
Consistency
49.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Incarnate Word: 3. Baylor: 1. Army: 0. North Texas: 0. UTEP: 2. UAB: 0. Rice: 1. Texas A&M: 2. Old Dominion: 2. Southern Miss: 1. Florida Atlantic: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Incarnate Word: 4 by 46.7. Baylor: 1 by 14.2. Army: 2 by 8.3. North Texas: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 0 by 20. UAB: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 5 by 30.8. Texas A&M: 9 by 57.5. Old Dominion: 4 by 36.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 14.2. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 36.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | vs Florida AtlanticSplash game | L 26-40 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Southern Miss | L 17-36 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Old DominionSplash game | W 24-23 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Texas A&MSplash game | L 14-45 | 9 | 7 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Rice | W 31-27 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs UAB | L 14-33 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | @ UTEPSplash game | W 26-16 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ North Texas | L 3-45 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Army | L 13-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Baylor | L 14-63 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Incarnate WordSplash game | W 35-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Player Story
Cassius Grady built his college career from 2015 through 2019 as a cornerback from Arlington, TX wearing No. 28, spending time with Northern Illinois and UTSA. The clearest part of Cassius Grady's career was his defensive production: 81 tackles, 7.5 tackles for loss, 1 sack, and 6 interceptions across 23 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2018 with UTSA. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Cassius Grady's production has multiple signals. With 23 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Northern Illinois and UTSA.
The arc is straightforward: Cassius Grady moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Northern Illinois
2015
Opening stop
UTSA
2016-2019
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 12.5 | 26.1 | 6.8 | 12.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 14 | 26.4 | 5.3 | 1.5 |
#1 Featured game
@ Marshall
Week 12 · L 0-23 · Conference game
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Havoc Plays
86.9 takeover
4 disruption/tackle impact with 86.9 takeover score.
#2
@ Texas A&M
Week 10 · L 14-45
2
Havoc Plays
74.7 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 74.7 takeover score.
#3
vs Incarnate Word
Week 1 · W 35-7
3
Havoc Plays
68.1 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 68.1 takeover score.
#4
vs Louisiana Tech
Week 7 · L 3-31 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
63.6 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 63.6 takeover score.
#5
@ UAB
Week 10 · L 3-52 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
62.2 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
14 primary output · 26.4 efficiency · 5.3 usage
54.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
53.1
12.5 primary · 26.1 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
9
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.