Usage Score
20.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Ball State
Riley Miller
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Yorktown, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Riley Miller reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.6
Consistency
59.4
Season Value
64.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Ball State
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Riley Miller, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Ball State. Riley Miller reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Ball State paired 878 primary output with 80.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Ball State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
73.2
Efficiency
80.6
Usage
20.3
Consistency
59.4
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 65. Notre Dame: 51. Indiana: 3. Western Kentucky: 112. Kent State: 208. Northern Illinois: 65. Central Michigan: 42. Eastern Michigan: 36. Ohio: 30. Toledo: 101. Western Michigan: 94. Miami (OH): 71
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 6 by 56.7. Indiana: 1 by 20. Western Kentucky: 8 by 93.3. Kent State: 11 by 100. Northern Illinois: 5 by 86.7. Central Michigan: 5 by 56. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 60. Ohio: 2 by 100. Toledo: 5 by 100. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Miami (OH): 5 by 94.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins114.7 · Games = 3 · +56.0 vs Losses
Losses58.6 · Games = 8 · -56.0 vs Wins
First Half84 · Games = 6 · +21.7 vs Second Half
Second Half62.3 · Games = 6 · -21.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/21 | @ Miami (OH) | L 21-42 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 1 | 22 |
| Tue 11/13 | vs Western Michigan | W 42-41 | — | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Wed 10/31 | @ Toledo100 receiving yards | L 13-45 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 1 | 47 |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Ohio | L 14-52 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 20-42 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Central Michigan | W 24-23 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Northern Illinois | L 16-24 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-24 | — | 11 | 208 | 18.9 | 18.90 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Western Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-28 | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Indiana | L 10-38 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-24 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Ball State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ball State | 300 | 65.7 | 14 | 300 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ball State | 878 | 80.6 | 20.3 | 578 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ball State | 612 | 81 | 19 | -266 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
208
Primary metric
208 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
116
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 81.9 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Ball State
878 primary output · 80.6 efficiency · 20.3 usage
64.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Ball State
58.7
612 primary · 81 efficiency · 19 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Ball State
40.1
300 primary · 65.7 efficiency · 14 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,790
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.