Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2015-2016Idaho
Callen Hightower
WR
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Callen Hightower reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.7
Consistency
57.4
Season Value
47.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Idaho
151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Idaho
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Callen Hightower, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Idaho. Callen Hightower reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Idaho paired 749 primary output with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Idaho
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
38.3
Efficiency
65.7
Usage
17.5
Consistency
57.4
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado State: 33. Unknown: 11. Washington: 5. Washington State: 37. UNLV: 67. Troy: 38. Louisiana: 10. Texas State: 49. South Alabama: 111. Georgia State: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado State: 3 by 73.3. Unknown: 1 by 73.3. Washington: 2 by 16.7. Washington State: 5 by 49.3. UNLV: 4 by 100. Troy: 4 by 63.3. Louisiana: 1 by 66.7. Texas State: 5 by 65.3. South Alabama: 5 by 100. Georgia State: 3 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Wins48.7 · n=6 · +22.0 vs Losses
Losses26.7 · n=3 · -22.0 vs Wins
First Half30.6 · n=5 · -15.4 vs Second Half
Second Half46 · n=5 · +15.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | @ Colorado State | W 61-50 | — | 3 | 33 | 9.3 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Georgia State | W 37-12 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs South Alabama100 receiving yards | W 38-31 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Texas State | W 47-14 | — | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Louisiana | W 23-13 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Troy | L 13-34 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ UNLV | W 33-30 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Washington State | L 6-56 | — | 5 | 37 | 5.5 | 7.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Washington | L 14-59 | — | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Idaho
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Idaho | 749 | 72.1 | 20.6 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Idaho | 383 | 65.7 | 17.5 | -366 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Idaho | 383 | 65.7 | 17.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Auburn
161
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas State
128
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 94.8 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
UNLV
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Idaho
749 primary output · 72.1 efficiency · 20.6 usage
62.9
#2
2016 Postseason · Idaho
47.7
383 primary · 65.7 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Idaho
47.7
383 primary · 65.7 efficiency · 17.5 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,132
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.