Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Purdue
LB • 6'1" • 240 lbs • Columbus, OH, USA
Markus Bailey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.9
Efficiency
43.7
Consistency
52.8
Season Value
30.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Markus Bailey, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Purdue. Markus Bailey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Purdue paired 3 primary output with 44.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 43.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
43.7
Usage
11.9
Consistency
52.8
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Nevada: 1. Maryland: 1. Illinois: 1. Iowa: 0. Nebraska: 0. Penn State: 1. Minnesota: 0.5. Northwestern: 3.5. Wisconsin: 2. Indiana: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Cincinnati: 9 by 37.5. Nevada: 3 by 22.5. Maryland: 5 by 30.8. Illinois: 11 by 55.8. Iowa: 11 by 45.8. Nebraska: 6 by 25. Penn State: 7 by 39.2. Minnesota: 12 by 55. Northwestern: 12 by 85. Wisconsin: 9 by 57.5. Indiana: 8 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
85 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ IndianaSplash game | L 24-26 | 8 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs WisconsinSplash game | L 20-49 | 9 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Northwestern10+ tackles · Splash game | L 17-45 | 12 | 8 | — | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Minnesota10+ tackles | L 31-44 | 12 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Penn State | L 24-62 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Nebraska | L 14-27 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Iowa10+ tackles | L 35-49 | 11 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Illinois10+ tackles | W 34-31 | 11 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Maryland | L 7-50 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nevada | W 24-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Cincinnati | L 20-38 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 12 | 43.7 | 11.9 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 21 | 44.7 | 12.4 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 21 | 44.7 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 14.5 | 48 | 14.2 | -6.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 3 | 44.2 | 15.6 | -11.5 |
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 76 takeover score.
#2
Boston College
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 67.7 takeover score.
#3
Michigan
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.2 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.7 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
3 primary output · 44.2 efficiency · 15.6 usage
33.8
#2
2017 Postseason · Purdue
33.6
21 primary · 44.7 efficiency · 12.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
33.6
21 primary · 44.7 efficiency · 12.4 usage
3
Impact games
7
Splash games
13
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9406
Edison · Miami, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
295
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Markus Bailey quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit