Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Minnesota
Sam Renner
DL • 6'4" • 275 lbs • Maple Grove, MN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Sam Renner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
27.2
Consistency
42.6
Season Value
30.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Minnesota
1617181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Minnesota
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam Renner, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Minnesota. Sam Renner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Minnesota paired 17.5 primary output with 27.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 27.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Minnesota
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
27.2
Usage
9.5
Consistency
42.6
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 2.5. Unknown: 1. Fresno State: 2. Georgia Southern: 0. Purdue: 2. Illinois: 0.5. Nebraska: 4. Rutgers: 0. Maryland: 0. Penn State: 1. Iowa: 1.5. Northwestern: 3. Wisconsin: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 3 by 37.5. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Fresno State: 4 by 36.7. Georgia Southern: 2 by 8.3. Purdue: 3 by 32.5. Illinois: 2 by 13.3. Nebraska: 4 by 56.7. Rutgers: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Penn State: 1 by 14.2. Iowa: 6 by 40. Northwestern: 5 by 50.8. Wisconsin: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.5 · Games = 10 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 2 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half1.7 · Games = 7 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · Games = 6 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Auburn | W 31-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Wisconsin | L 17-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ NorthwesternSplash game | W 38-22 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Iowa | L 19-23 | 6 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Penn State | W 31-26 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Maryland | W 52-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Rutgers | W 42-7 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Nebraska | W 34-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Illinois | W 40-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Purdue | W 38-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Georgia Southern | W 35-32 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | @ Fresno State | W 38-35 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Minnesota
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Minnesota | 1.5 | 9.9 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | Minnesota | 17.5 | 27.2 | 9.5 | 16 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Minnesota | 17.5 | 27.2 | 9.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.8 takeover score.
#2
Northwestern
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#3
Auburn
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 41.3 takeover score.
#4
New Mexico State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.3 takeover score.
#5
Fresno State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Minnesota
17.5 primary output · 27.2 efficiency · 9.5 usage
30.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Minnesota
30.5
17.5 primary · 27.2 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Minnesota
6.2
1.5 primary · 9.9 efficiency · 1.9 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
56
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.