Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2014-2018Kansas
Jace Sternberger
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Kingfisher, OK, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jace Sternberger reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92
Consistency
68
Season Value
69.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
1415161818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kansas • Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jace Sternberger, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M. Jace Sternberger reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 832 primary output with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kansas, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
64
Efficiency
92
Usage
19.5
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
NC State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 28. Unknown: 56. Clemson: 48. UL Monroe: 42. Alabama: 59. Arkansas: 51. Kentucky: 95. South Carolina: 145. Mississippi State: 13. Auburn: 59. Ole Miss: 76. UAB: 85. LSU: 75
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 74.7. Clemson: 2 by 100. UL Monroe: 3 by 93.3. Alabama: 3 by 100. Arkansas: 4 by 85. Kentucky: 5 by 100. South Carolina: 7 by 100. Mississippi State: 2 by 43.3. Auburn: 3 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 100. UAB: 4 by 100. LSU: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins74.6 · n=8 · +29.9 vs Losses
Losses44.8 · n=4 · -29.9 vs Wins
First Half54.1 · n=7 · -21.4 vs Second Half
Second Half75.5 · n=6 · +21.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs NC State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs NC State | W 52-13 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs LSU2+ TD | W 74-72 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 36 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs UAB2+ TD | W 41-20 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-24 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Auburn | L 24-28 | — | 3 | 59 | 15.8 | 19.70 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Mississippi State | L 13-28 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ South Carolina100 receiving yards | W 26-23 | — | 7 | 145 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Kentucky | W 20-14 | — | 5 | 95 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Arkansas | W 24-17 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Alabama | L 23-45 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs UL Monroe | W 48-10 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Clemson | L 26-28 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 28 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 2 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas
2014-2016
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
20142015201620182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kansas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kansas | 5 | 33.3 | 3.6 | 5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 832 | 92 | 19.5 | 827 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 832 | 92 | 19.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
145
Primary metric
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kentucky
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ole Miss
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
LSU
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
832 primary output · 92 efficiency · 19.5 usage
69.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
69.9
832 primary · 92 efficiency · 19.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Kansas
21.9
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 3.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
837
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.