Usage Score
25.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Pittsburgh
Rafael Araujo-Lopes
WR • 5'9" • 190 lbs • Kissimmee, FL, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Rafael Araujo-Lopes reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62.8
Consistency
38.1
Season Value
49
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
151616171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rafael Araujo-Lopes, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Rafael Araujo-Lopes reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 531 primary output with 77.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
29.2
Efficiency
62.8
Usage
25.6
Consistency
38.1
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 13. Unknown: 50. Penn State: 0. Georgia Tech: 45. North Carolina: 8. UCF: 0. Syracuse: 64. Notre Dame: 32. Duke: 17. Virginia Tech: 1. Wake Forest: 73. Miami: 67. Clemson: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 1 by 86.7. Unknown: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 6 by 50. North Carolina: 2 by 26.7. Syracuse: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 6 by 35.6. Duke: 1 by 100. Virginia Tech: 2 by 3.3. Wake Forest: 6 by 81.1. Miami: 6 by 74.4. Clemson: 2 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins40 · n=5 · +21.4 vs Losses
Losses18.6 · n=7 · -21.4 vs Wins
First Half25.7 · n=7 · -7.6 vs Second Half
Second Half33.3 · n=6 · +7.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | vs Stanford | L 13-14 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Clemson | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Miami | L 3-24 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Wake Forest | W 34-13 | — | 6 | 73 | 12 | 12.20 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Virginia Tech | W 52-22 | — | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Duke | W 54-45 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-19 | — | 6 | 32 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Syracuse | W 44-37 | — | 2 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UCF | L 14-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ North Carolina | L 35-38 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Tech | W 24-19 | — | 6 | 45 | 5.6 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Penn State | L 6-51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 50 | 13.4 | 16.70 | 2 | 42 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 36 | 64.5 | 6.7 | 36 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 36 | 64.5 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 531 | 77.7 | 21.1 | 495 |
| 2018 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 380 | 62.8 | 25.6 | -151 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 380 | 62.8 | 25.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 95.2 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 81.1 efficiency score.
#4
Miami
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 74.4 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
531 primary output · 77.7 efficiency · 21.1 usage
66
#2
2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh
49
380 primary · 62.8 efficiency · 25.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
49
380 primary · 62.8 efficiency · 25.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
947
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.