Usage Score
26.5
Player Profile
T.J. Rahming
WR • 5'10" • 170 lbs • Powder Springs, GA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
T.J. Rahming reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.4
Consistency
36
Season Value
57
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Duke
15151617171818
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Duke
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Duke
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
T.J. Rahming, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Duke. T.J. Rahming reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Duke paired 739 primary output with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Duke
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.4
Efficiency
65.4
Usage
26.5
Consistency
36
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 240. Army: 44. Northwestern: 32. Baylor: 55. Unknown: 27. Virginia Tech: 30. Georgia Tech: 91. Virginia: 37. Pittsburgh: 78. Miami: 26. North Carolina: 98. Clemson: 38. Wake Forest: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 12 by 100. Army: 5 by 58.7. Northwestern: 4 by 53.3. Baylor: 4 by 91.7. Unknown: 4 by 45. Virginia Tech: 3 by 66.7. Georgia Tech: 4 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 41.1. Pittsburgh: 9 by 57.8. Miami: 5 by 34.7. North Carolina: 9 by 72.6. Clemson: 9 by 28.1. Wake Forest: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins83.7 · n=7 · +44.1 vs Losses
Losses39.6 · n=5 · -44.1 vs Wins
First Half74.1 · n=7 · +25.5 vs Second Half
Second Half48.7 · n=6 · -25.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs Temple100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-27 | — | 12 | 240 | 18.4 | 20 | 2 | 85 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Wake Forest | L 7-59 | — | 1 | 15 | 6.3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ ClemsonHigh volume | L 6-35 | — | 9 | 38 | 4.2 | 4.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs North CarolinaHigh volume | W 42-35 | — | 9 | 98 | 9.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Miami | W 20-12 | — | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ PittsburghHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 45-54 | — | 9 | 78 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Virginia | L 14-28 | — | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Georgia Tech | W 28-14 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Virginia Tech | L 14-31 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 27 | 13 | 6.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Baylor2+ TD | W 40-27 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | — | 4 | 32 | 6.4 | 8 | 1 | 18 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Army | W 34-14 | — | 5 | 44 | 10 | 8.80 | 0 | 35 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Duke | 571 | 73.5 | 18 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Duke | 571 | 73.5 | 18 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Duke | 739 | 72.1 | 27.7 | 168 |
| 2017 Postseason | Duke | 795 | 76.3 | 24.7 | 56 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Duke | 795 | 76.3 | 24.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Duke | 811 | 65.4 | 26.5 | 16 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Duke | 811 | 65.4 | 26.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
142
Primary metric
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia
190
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
190 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
240
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
240 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 78 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Duke
739 primary output · 72.1 efficiency · 27.7 usage
68.9
#2
2017 Postseason · Duke
62.1
795 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 24.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Duke
62.1
795 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 24.7 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
15
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,916
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.