Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2015-2017Tulane
Andrew Hicks
WR • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Belle Chasse, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Andrew Hicks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane
151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Hicks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane. Andrew Hicks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulane paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
— vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ SMU | L 38-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulane | 52 | 100 | 5.1 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | -52 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34
Primary metric
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCF
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tulane
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2015 Regular Season · Tulane
68.6
52 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.1 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Tulane
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7959
Belle Chasse · Belle Chasse, LA
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
52
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.