Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2014-2020Auburn
Richard McBryde
LB • 6'1" • 232 lbs • Troy, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Richard McBryde shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
34.3
Consistency
41.9
Season Value
24.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · SMU
141516171718191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Auburn • SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Richard McBryde, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · SMU. Richard McBryde shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
SMU paired 15 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 34.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Auburn, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · SMU
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
34.3
Usage
8.6
Consistency
41.9
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 1. North Texas: 1. Unknown: 1. Memphis: 2. Tulane: 2. Cincinnati: 0. Navy: 4. Temple: 2. Tulsa: 0. East Carolina: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 7 by 39.2. North Texas: 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Memphis: 8 by 53.3. Tulane: 7 by 49.2. Cincinnati: 2 by 8.3. Navy: 6 by 65. Temple: 9 by 57.5. Tulsa: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins2 · n=6 · +2 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=3 · -2 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · n=5 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · n=5 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
65 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | @ East Carolina | L 38-52 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Tulsa | L 24-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Temple | W 47-23 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Navy2+ sacks · Splash game | W 51-37 | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Cincinnati | L 13-42 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/16 | @ Tulane | W 37-34 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | vs MemphisSplash game | W 30-27 | 8 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | @ North Texas | W 65-35 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Texas State | W 31-24 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2014-2018
Opening stop
- 2
SMU
2019-2020
Final stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720172018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Auburn | 1 | 9.2 | 0.9 | 1 |
| 2017 Postseason | Auburn | 2 | 9.3 | 2.6 | 1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Auburn | 2 | 9.3 | 2.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | -2 |
| 2019 Postseason | SMU | 15 | 43.3 | 9.7 | 15 |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 15 | 43.3 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | SMU | 13 | 34.3 | 8.6 | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 72 takeover score.
#2
Navy
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.2 takeover score.
#3
Temple
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.2 takeover score.
#4
Houston
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49 takeover score.
#5
Missouri
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · SMU
15 primary output · 43.3 efficiency · 9.7 usage
29.2
#2
2019 Regular Season · SMU
29.2
15 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · SMU
24.9
13 primary · 34.3 efficiency · 8.6 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
5
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
165
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.