Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2015-2017Arizona
Christian Poe
WR • 6'3" • Tucson, AZ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Christian Poe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
15
Developing production for a receiver
lowelite
Reliability
11
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
21
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Army
151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Unique Seasons
- 3
- Program Path
- Army • Arizona
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
2★
- Committed To
- Army
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Christian Poe, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Army. Christian Poe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 84
- Receptions
- 7
Quick Answers
Christian Poe quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Arizona · WR
- Career Receiving Yards
- 84
- Tracked sample
- 3 unique seasons · 3 entries · 5 games
- Best season
- 2016 Regular Season · Army
- Top game
- Buffalo
- Recruit profile
- 2-star · Cienega · Army
- High school pipeline
- Cienega · 3 FBS recruits · 0 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 87 · Class 2017
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 5 | 7 | 84 | 0 | 86.9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Keep exploring Christian Poe
Christian Poe played WR for Army and Arizona. Across 3 tracked seasons, Christian Poe recorded 84 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Army.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Army paired 84 primary output with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Army, Arizona.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Army
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
16.8
Efficiency
75.3
Usage
29.3
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 17. Buffalo: 23. Lafayette: 24. North Texas: 11. Notre Dame: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 1 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Lafayette: 2 by 80. North Texas: 2 by 36.7. Notre Dame: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins20.5 · Games = 2 · +6.2 vs Losses
Losses14.3 · Games = 3 · -6.2 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2015-2016
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona
2017
Final stop
Season Value Progression
201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 84 | 75.3 | 29.3 | 84 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | -84 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
@ Buffalo
Week 4 · L 20-23
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23
Receiving Yards
93 takeover
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Lafayette
Week 7 · W 62-7
24
Receiving Yards
91.8 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
@ UTEP
Week 3 · W 66-14
17
Receiving Yards
72.8 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Notre Dame
Week 11 · L 6-44 · Conference game
9
Receiving Yards
65.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
vs North Texas
Week 8 · L 18-35
11
Receiving Yards
59.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Army
84 primary output · 75.3 efficiency · 29.3 usage
86.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Arizona
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Christian Poe
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.