Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2016Army
RB • 5'10" • Pelham, GA, USA
Christian Drake leans balanced backfield option traits and 40.6 efficiency.
Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
4
Developing production for a back
Reliability
0
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
15
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Christian Drake, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Army. Christian Drake leans balanced backfield option traits and 40.6 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 7 | 138 | 138 | 0 | 1 | 53.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 5 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 23.2 |
Related Context
Christian Drake played RB for Army. Across 2 tracked seasons, Christian Drake recorded 168 rushing yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Army paired 138 primary output with 56.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 40.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Scrimmage Yards / G
6
Efficiency
40.6
Usage
2.1
Consistency
24.4
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 24. UTEP: 2. Lafayette: -4. Wake Forest: 8. Morgan State: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 2 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 20.8. Lafayette: 2 by 0. Wake Forest: 2 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 138 | 56.8 | 4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 30 | 40.6 | 2.1 | -108 |
#1 Featured game
vs Tulane
Week 11 · L 31-34
Loss with 69 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
69
Scrimmage Yards
74.6 takeover
69 scrimmage yards and 8.3 usage.
#2
@ Temple
Week 1 · W 28-13
24
Scrimmage Yards
69.4 takeover
Win with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
24 scrimmage yards and 2.9 usage.
#3
vs Wake Forest
Week 3 · L 14-17
37
Scrimmage Yards
54.6 takeover
Loss with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
37 scrimmage yards and 3.6 usage.
#4
@ Navy
Week 15 · L 17-21
19
Scrimmage Yards
42.7 takeover
Loss with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 3.8 usage.
#5
vs Rutgers
Week 12 · L 21-31
16
Scrimmage Yards
31.4 takeover
Loss with 16 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
16 scrimmage yards and 5.4 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · Army
138 primary output · 56.8 efficiency · 4 usage
53.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
23.2
30 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 2.1 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.