Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2017Army
QB • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Imperial, CA, USA
Chris Carter is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
17
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
18
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
34
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Player Story
Chris Carter built his college career from 2015 through 2017 as a quarterback from Imperial, CA wearing No. 7, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Chris Carter's career was his backfield work: 384 rushing...
Read the storyChris Carter, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Army. Chris Carter is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 2 | 477 | 348 | 129 | 3 | 89.7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 8 | 420 | 165 | 255 | 4 | 47 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Chris Carter played QB for Army. Across 3 tracked seasons, Chris Carter recorded 513 passing yards, 384 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Army paired 477 primary output with 62.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
52.5
Efficiency
55.4
Usage
9.2
Consistency
24.2
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 7. Rice: 41. UTEP: 141. Buffalo: 20. Lafayette: 159. Wake Forest: 8. Notre Dame: 30. Morgan State: 14
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 3 by 62.1. Rice: 5 by 91.7. UTEP: 11 by 100. Buffalo: 5 by 12.5. Lafayette: 13 by 85. Wake Forest: 4 by 31.7. Notre Dame: 16 by 31.8. Morgan State: 5 by 28
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | vs Morgan State | W 60-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28 | 5 | 14 | 2.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-44 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.8 | 11 | 30 | 2.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake Forest | W 21-13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.7 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Lafayette3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 62-7 | 4 | 9 | 103 | 44.4 | 2 | 0 | 85 | 4 | 56 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo | L 20-23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 12.5 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEPDual-threat | W 66-14 | 2 | 2 | 47 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 9 | 94 | 10.40 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Rice | W 31-14 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 91.7 | 4 | 30 | 7.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 62.1 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 2 |
Player Story
Chris Carter built his college career from 2015 through 2017 as a quarterback from Imperial, CA wearing No. 7, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Chris Carter's career was his backfield work: 384 rushing yards, 84 carries, and 3 rushing touchdowns across 10 career games in the available record. His career also includes 513 passing yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Chris Carter's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 477 | 62.2 | 44.3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 420 | 55.4 | 9.2 | -57 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | -420 |
#1 Featured game
@ Navy
Week 15 · L 17-21
Loss with 226 yards of offense and 60.4 efficiency.
226
Total Offense
83.5 takeover
226 total offense with 60.4 efficiency.
#2
vs Rutgers
Week 12 · L 21-31
251
Total Offense
83.2 takeover
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
251 total offense with 63.9 efficiency.
#3
@ UTEP
Week 3 · W 66-14
141
Total Offense
72 takeover
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
141 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#4
vs Lafayette
Week 7 · W 62-7
159
Total Offense
67.1 takeover
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
159 total offense with 85 efficiency.
#5
vs Rice
Week 2 · W 31-14
41
Total Offense
43.5 takeover
Win with 41 yards of offense and 91.7 efficiency.
41 total offense with 91.7 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · Army
477 primary output · 62.2 efficiency · 44.3 usage
89.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
47
420 primary · 55.4 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
1
3+ TD games
6
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.