Usage Score
9.2
Player Profile
Chris Carter
QB • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Imperial, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Chris Carter is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
55.4
Consistency
24.2
Season Value
44
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Army
151617
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Primary stop by seasons
- Army
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Army
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Chris Carter, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Army. Chris Carter is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Army paired 477 primary output with 62.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Army
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
52.5
Efficiency
55.4
Usage
9.2
Consistency
24.2
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 7. Rice: 41. UTEP: 141. Buffalo: 20. Unknown: 159. Wake Forest: 8. Notre Dame: 30. Unknown: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 3 by 62.1. Rice: 5 by 91.7. UTEP: 11 by 100. Buffalo: 5 by 12.5. Unknown: 13 by 85. Wake Forest: 4 by 31.7. Notre Dame: 16 by 31.8. Unknown: 5 by 28
Split Comparison
Wins49.3 · n=4 · +24.3 vs Losses
Losses25 · n=2 · -24.3 vs Wins
First Half52.3 · n=4 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half52.8 · n=4 · +0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28 | 5 | 14 | 2.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-44 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.8 | 11 | 30 | 2.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake Forest | W 21-13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.7 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Unknown3+ TD · Dual-threat | — | 4 | 9 | 103 | 44.4 | 2 | 0 | 85 | 4 | 56 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo | L 20-23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 12.5 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEPDual-threat | W 66-14 | 2 | 2 | 47 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 9 | 94 | 10.40 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Rice | W 31-14 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 91.7 | 4 | 30 | 7.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 62.1 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 477 | 62.2 | 44.3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 420 | 55.4 | 9.2 | -57 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | -420 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
251
Primary metric
251 total offense with 63.9 efficiency.
#2
UTEP
141
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
141 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
Navy
226
Primary metric
Loss with 226 yards of offense and 60.4 efficiency.
226 total offense with 60.4 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
159
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
159 total offense with 85 efficiency.
#5
Rice
41
Primary metric
Win with 41 yards of offense and 91.7 efficiency.
41 total offense with 91.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Army
477 primary output · 62.2 efficiency · 44.3 usage
76
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
44
420 primary · 55.4 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
6
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
897
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.