Usage Score
3.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Rice
CB • 5'9" • 177 lbs • Hutto, TX, USA
Brandon Douglas-Dotson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.6
Efficiency
19.9
Consistency
57.5
Season Value
28.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Douglas-Dotson, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice. Brandon Douglas-Dotson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rice paired 11 primary output with 19.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 19.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
19.9
Usage
3.6
Consistency
57.5
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 0. UTEP: 1. Houston: 1. Florida International: 3. Pittsburgh: 1. Army: 0. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. UAB: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Old Dominion: 2. North Texas: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 1 by 4.2. UTEP: 1 by 14.2. Houston: 2 by 18.3. Florida International: 4 by 46.7. Pittsburgh: 4 by 26.7. Army: 3 by 12.5. UTSA: 3 by 12.5. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 14.2. UAB: 3 by 12.5. Southern Miss: 2 by 18.3. Old Dominion: 6 by 45. North Texas: 1 by 14.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs North Texas | L 14-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Old Dominion | L 21-24 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | L 34-43 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ UAB | L 21-52 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 28-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ UTSA | L 7-20 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Army | L 12-49 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Pittsburgh | L 10-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Florida International | L 7-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ Houston | L 3-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 8/27 | vs Stanford | L 7-62 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 2 | 7.6 | 0.9 | 2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 11 | 19.9 | 3.6 | 9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 6 | 19 | 5.8 | -5 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
#2
Florida International
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
#3
Hawai'i
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.2 takeover score.
#4
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.8 takeover score.
#5
Old Dominion
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rice
11 primary output · 19.9 efficiency · 3.6 usage
28.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Rice
23.1
6 primary · 19 efficiency · 5.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rice
6
2 primary · 7.6 efficiency · 0.9 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8761
Henderson County · Henderson, KY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
52
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brandon Douglas-Dotson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit