Usage Score
2.8
Player Dossier
2015-2017Rice
DB • 5'11" • 200 lbs • Missouri City, TX, USA
Christian Bertrand shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 12 disruption score.
Usage Score
2.8
Efficiency
12
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
12.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Bertrand, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice. Christian Bertrand shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 12 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rice paired 4.5 primary output with 12 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 12 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
12
Usage
2.8
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 1. UTEP: 0. Houston: 0. Florida International: 2. Pittsburgh: 1. Army: 0. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0.5. UAB: 0. Southern Miss: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 0 by 10. UTEP: 1 by 4.2. Houston: 2 by 8.3. Florida International: 3 by 32.5. Pittsburgh: 2 by 18.3. Army: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 21.7. UAB: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
32.5 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | L 34-43 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ UAB | L 21-52 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 28-42 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ UTSA | L 7-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Army | L 12-49 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Pittsburgh | L 10-42 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Florida International | L 7-13 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ Houston | L 3-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/27 | vs Stanford | L 7-62 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 2 | 11.9 | 1.7 | 2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 4.5 | 12 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#2
Western Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.7 takeover score.
#3
Baylor
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.1 takeover score.
#4
Pittsburgh
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.9 takeover score.
#5
Stanford
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 20 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rice
4.5 primary output · 12 efficiency · 2.8 usage
12.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Rice
8.1
2 primary · 11.9 efficiency · 1.7 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7885
Hightower · Missouri City, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
36
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Christian Bertrand quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit