Usage / Role
1%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2016SMU
DB • 6'0" • Copper Canyon, TX, USA
Christian Burks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 2.1 disruption score.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
7
Developing production for a defensive back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
15
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Christian Burks, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · SMU. Christian Burks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 2.1 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 35 |
Related Context
Christian Burks played DB for SMU. Across 2 tracked seasons, Christian Burks recorded 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
SMU paired 0 primary output with 2.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 2.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
2.1
Usage
0.4
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 0. Tulane: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Tulane
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Tulane
Week 9 · W 35-31 · Conference game
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Havoc Plays
3.3 takeover
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
#2
@ Temple
Week 5 · L 20-45 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
0 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · SMU
0 primary output · 2.1 efficiency · 0.4 usage
35
#2
2015 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.