Usage Score
35.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019SMU
James Proche
WR • 6'0" • 193 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
James Proche reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.8
Consistency
69.5
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · SMU
1617181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
James Proche, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · SMU. James Proche reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
SMU paired 1,199 primary output with 81.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · SMU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
94.2
Efficiency
72.8
Usage
35.6
Consistency
69.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 86. Arkansas State: 66. North Texas: 115. Texas State: 33. TCU: 66. South Florida: 96. Tulsa: 153. Temple: 80. Houston: 83. Memphis: 149. East Carolina: 167. Navy: 60. Tulane: 71
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 9 by 63.7. Arkansas State: 7 by 62.9. North Texas: 7 by 100. Texas State: 3 by 73.3. TCU: 10 by 44. South Florida: 7 by 91.4. Tulsa: 11 by 92.7. Temple: 9 by 59.3. Houston: 7 by 79. Memphis: 13 by 76.4. East Carolina: 14 by 79.5. Navy: 7 by 57.1. Tulane: 7 by 67.6
Split Comparison
Wins93 · n=10 · -5.3 vs Losses
Losses98.3 · n=3 · +5.3 vs Wins
First Half87.9 · n=7 · -13.8 vs Second Half
Second Half101.7 · n=6 · +13.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Florida AtlanticHigh volume | L 28-52 | — | 9 | 86 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Tulane | W 37-20 | — | 7 | 71 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Navy | L 28-35 | — | 7 | 60 | 7.8 | 8.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 59-51 | — | 14 | 167 | 11.3 | 11.90 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 48-54 | — | 13 | 149 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 49 |
| Thu 10/24 | @ Houston | W 34-31 | — | 7 | 83 | 10.6 | 11.90 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs TempleHigh volume | W 45-21 | — | 9 | 80 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | W 43-37 | — | 11 | 153 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ South Florida2+ TD | W 48-21 | — | 7 | 96 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 2 | 39 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ TCUHigh volume | W 41-38 | — | 10 | 66 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Texas State | W 47-17 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards | W 49-27 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Arkansas State | W 37-30 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 709 | 68.9 | 23.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | SMU | 816 | 84.7 | 15.9 | 107 |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 1,199 | 81.6 | 33.7 | 383 |
| 2019 Postseason | SMU | 1,225 | 72.8 | 35.6 | 26 |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 1,225 | 72.8 | 35.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
166
Primary metric
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
183
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
183 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
153
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 92.7 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
173
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · SMU
1,199 primary output · 81.6 efficiency · 33.7 usage
70.8
#2
2019 Postseason · SMU
69.4
1,225 primary · 72.8 efficiency · 35.6 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · SMU
69.4
1,225 primary · 72.8 efficiency · 35.6 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8115
Beechwood · Fort Mitchell, KY
- Committed To
- Western Kentucky
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,949
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.