Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2015-2016Memphis
Arthur Maulet
DB • 5'11" • New Orleans, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Arthur Maulet shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
41.6
Consistency
32.9
Season Value
30.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis
151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Arthur Maulet, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis. Arthur Maulet shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Memphis paired 26 primary output with 41.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 41.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Memphis
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2
Efficiency
41.6
Usage
10.2
Consistency
32.9
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 6.5. Unknown: 4. Kansas: 1. Bowling Green: 0. Ole Miss: 2. Temple: 0. Tulane: 1. Navy: 0. Tulsa: 2.5. SMU: 2. South Florida: 1. Cincinnati: 1. Houston: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 11 by 95.8. Unknown: 2 by 48.3. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. Bowling Green: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 5 by 40.8. Temple: 1 by 4.2. Tulane: 7 by 39.2. Navy: 6 by 25. Tulsa: 7 by 54.2. SMU: 7 by 49.2. South Florida: 6 by 35. Cincinnati: 10 by 51.7. Houston: 6 by 75
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=7 · -1.0 vs Losses
Losses2.4 · n=5 · +1.0 vs Wins
First Half2.1 · n=7 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.9 · n=6 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Best efficiency game
95.8 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/21 | @ Western Kentucky10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | L 31-51 | 11 | 8 | — | 3.50 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Houston | W 48-44 | 6 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Cincinnati10+ tackles | W 34-7 | 10 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs South Florida | L 42-49 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ SMU | W 51-7 | 7 | 7 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Tulsa | L 30-59 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Navy | L 28-42 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tulane | W 24-14 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 10/7 | vs Temple | W 34-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ole Miss | L 28-48 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Bowling Green | W 77-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Kansas | W 43-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Memphis | 2 | 13.3 | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Memphis | 26 | 41.6 | 10.2 | 24 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 26 | 41.6 | 10.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6.5
Primary metric
6.5 disruption/tackle impact with 74.5 takeover score.
#2
Ole Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Cincinnati
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Houston
5
Primary metric
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.7 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 39 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Memphis
26 primary output · 41.6 efficiency · 10.2 usage
30.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Memphis
30.1
26 primary · 41.6 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Memphis
27.1
2 primary · 13.3 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
71
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.