Usage Score
29.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Tulane
QB • 6'2" • 230 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Jonathan Banks is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
29.9
Efficiency
63.9
Consistency
76.4
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Banks, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane. Jonathan Banks is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulane paired 2,389 primary output with 63.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 63.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with 362 yards of offense and 66.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
217.2
Efficiency
63.9
Usage
29.9
Consistency
76.4
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 254. Navy: 19. Army: 143. Tulsa: 258. Florida International: 95. South Florida: 240. Memphis: 222. Cincinnati: 271. East Carolina: 206. Houston: 319. SMU: 362
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 31 by 77.4. Navy: 8 by 50.4. Army: 32 by 56.1. Tulsa: 23 by 90.6. Florida International: 36 by 38.6. South Florida: 30 by 60.1. Memphis: 51 by 53.9. Cincinnati: 34 by 78.5. East Carolina: 31 by 61. Houston: 41 by 69.5. SMU: 50 by 66.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
90.6 vs Tulsa
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ SMU300-yard game | L 38-41 | 18 | 31 | 314 | 58.1 | 2 | 0 | 66.9 | 19 | 48 | 2.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs HoustonDual-threat | W 20-17 | 17 | 25 | 251 | 68.0 | 1 | 1 | 69.5 | 16 | 68 | 4.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ East CarolinaDual-threat | W 31-24 | 11 | 19 | 110 | 57.9 | 0 | 2 | 61 | 12 | 96 | 8 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs CincinnatiDual-threat | L 16-17 | 17 | 24 | 196 | 70.8 | 0 | 0 | 78.5 | 10 | 75 | 7.50 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Memphis3+ TD | L 26-56 | 15 | 30 | 203 | 50.0 | 3 | 0 | 53.9 | 21 | 19 | 0.90 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs South Florida | L 28-34 | 9 | 19 | 221 | 47.4 | 2 | 1 | 60.1 | 11 | 19 | 1.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Florida InternationalDual-threat | L 10-23 | 5 | 16 | 36 | 31.3 | 0 | 1 | 38.6 | 20 | 59 | 3 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs TulsaDual-threat | W 62-28 | 9 | 13 | 165 | 69.2 | 1 | 0 | 90.6 | 10 | 93 | 9.30 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Army | W 21-17 | 10 | 22 | 103 | 45.5 | 0 | 0 | 56.1 | 10 | 40 | 4 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Navy | L 21-23 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Unknown3+ TD · Dual-threat | — | 10 | 15 | 185 | 66.7 | 3 | 0 | 77.4 | 16 | 69 | 4.30 | 1 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulane | 2,389 | 63.9 | 29.9 | 2,389 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulane | 1,194 | 55.8 | 25.6 | -1,195 |
#1 Featured game
SMU
Loss with 362 yards of offense and 66.9 efficiency.
362
Primary metric
362 total offense with 66.9 efficiency.
#2
Wake Forest
319
Primary metric
Loss with 319 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency.
319 total offense with 59.3 efficiency.
#3
Houston
319
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
319 total offense with 69.5 efficiency.
#4
Cincinnati
271
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
271 total offense with 78.5 efficiency.
#5
Unknown
254
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
254 total offense with 77.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tulane
2,389 primary output · 63.9 efficiency · 29.9 usage
67.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Tulane
52.4
1,194 primary · 55.8 efficiency · 25.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Tulane
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
6
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,583
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jonathan Banks quick answers