Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2014-2017Central Michigan
Tyler Conklin
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Chesterfield, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tyler Conklin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.8
Consistency
56.8
Season Value
61.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Conklin, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan. Tyler Conklin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 560 primary output with 82 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
63
Efficiency
74.8
Usage
22.2
Consistency
56.8
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 98. Ohio: 136. Toledo: 48. Ball State: 45. Western Michigan: 2. Eastern Michigan: 4. Kent State: 104. Northern Illinois: 67
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 7 by 93.3. Ohio: 10 by 90.7. Toledo: 3 by 100. Ball State: 3 by 100. Western Michigan: 1 by 13.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Kent State: 4 by 100. Northern Illinois: 6 by 74.4
Split Comparison
Wins59.7 · n=6 · -13.3 vs Losses
Losses73 · n=2 · +13.3 vs Wins
First Half81.8 · n=4 · +37.5 vs Second Half
Second Half44.3 · n=4 · -37.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | @ Wyoming | L 14-37 | — | 7 | 98 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 31 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Northern Illinois | W 31-24 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards | W 42-23 | — | 4 | 104 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 42 |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 42-30 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Western Michigan | W 35-28 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ball State | W 56-9 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Toledo | L 10-30 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | W 26-23 | — | 10 | 136 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 2 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 95 | 82.5 | 4.9 | 95 |
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 560 | 82 | 15.8 | 465 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 560 | 82 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Central Michigan | 504 | 74.8 | 22.2 | -56 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 504 | 74.8 | 22.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136
Primary metric
136 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma State
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
560 primary output · 82 efficiency · 15.8 usage
65.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
65.2
560 primary · 82 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
61.4
504 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 22.2 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,159
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.