Usage Score
27.7
Player Dossier
2015-2019Vanderbilt
QB • 6'6" • 225 lbs • Yorktown, IN, USA
Riley Neal is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
27.7
Efficiency
60.9
Consistency
85.6
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Ball State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Riley Neal, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Ball State. Riley Neal is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Ball State paired 3,081 primary output with 60.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 60.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ball State, Vanderbilt.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
280.1
Efficiency
60.9
Usage
27.7
Consistency
85.6
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia State: 178. Indiana: 230. Unknown: 282. Florida Atlantic: 326. Northern Illinois: 292. Central Michigan: 187. Buffalo: 256. Akron: 263. Eastern Michigan: 438. Toledo: 345. Miami (OH): 284
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia State: 33 by 65.4. Indiana: 36 by 50.2. Unknown: 49 by 66.7. Florida Atlantic: 51 by 65.2. Northern Illinois: 55 by 56.4. Central Michigan: 38 by 49.5. Buffalo: 37 by 57. Akron: 47 by 65. Eastern Michigan: 62 by 61.8. Toledo: 63 by 68.1. Miami (OH): 50 by 64.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
68.1 vs Toledo
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/23 | @ Miami (OH)Dual-threat | L 20-21 | 22 | 34 | 188 | 64.7 | 1 | 1 | 64.8 | 16 | 96 | 6 | 1 | 21 |
| Thu 11/17 | @ ToledoDual-threat | L 19-37 | 33 | 49 | 260 | 67.3 | 2 | 0 | 68.1 | 14 | 85 | 6.10 | 0 | 35 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Eastern Michigan300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 41-48 | 30 | 50 | 393 | 60.0 | 3 | 2 | 61.8 | 12 | 45 | 3.80 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs AkronDual-threat | L 25-35 | 23 | 34 | 187 | 67.6 | 1 | 1 | 65 | 13 | 76 | 5.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Buffalo | W 31-21 | 12 | 22 | 212 | 54.5 | 0 | 2 | 57 | 15 | 44 | 2.90 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Central Michigan | L 21-24 | 18 | 30 | 174 | 60.0 | 1 | 2 | 49.5 | 8 | 13 | 1.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Northern Illinois | L 24-31 | 23 | 40 | 276 | 57.5 | 0 | 0 | 56.4 | 15 | 16 | 1.10 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Florida Atlantic3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 31-27 | 23 | 37 | 252 | 62.2 | 2 | 1 | 65.2 | 14 | 74 | 5.30 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 28 | 39 | 238 | 71.8 | 2 | 0 | 66.7 | 10 | 44 | 4.40 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Indiana | L 20-30 | 15 | 30 | 231 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.2 | 6 | -1 | -0.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Georgia State | W 31-21 | 15 | 29 | 130 | 51.7 | 0 | 2 | 65.4 | 4 | 48 | 12 | 0 | 46 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ball State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Vanderbilt
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Ball State | 2,675 | 61.4 | 23.1 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ball State | 3,081 | 60.9 | 27.7 | 406 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ball State | 726 | 60.2 | 17.4 | -2,355 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ball State | 2,274 | 62.9 | 23.6 | 1,548 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 1,632 | 54.3 | 16.6 | -642 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
438
Primary metric
438 total offense with 61.8 efficiency.
#2
Kent State
463
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
463 total offense with 68.6 efficiency.
#3
Toledo
345
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
345 total offense with 68.1 efficiency.
#4
Illinois
245
Primary metric
Loss with 245 yards of offense and 56.8 efficiency.
245 total offense with 56.8 efficiency.
#5
Northern Illinois
411
Primary metric
Loss with 411 yards of offense and 58.2 efficiency.
411 total offense with 58.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Ball State
3,081 primary output · 60.9 efficiency · 27.7 usage
68.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Ball State
62.7
2,675 primary · 61.4 efficiency · 23.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Ball State
59.3
2,274 primary · 62.9 efficiency · 23.6 usage
19
250+ passing yards
8
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
22
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8531
Yorktown · Yorktown, IN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
10,388
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Riley Neal quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit