Usage Score
23.4
Player Dossier
2012-2019Colorado
RB • 5'10" • 205 lbs • The Woodlands, TX, USA
Patrick Carr leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.4 efficiency.
Usage Score
23.4
Efficiency
55.4
Consistency
62.9
Season Value
48.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Carr, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Houston. Patrick Carr leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.4 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Houston paired 868 primary output with 60.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 168 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
69.7
Efficiency
55.4
Usage
23.4
Consistency
62.9
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 77. Tulane: 63. North Texas: 168. Cincinnati: 22. Tulsa: 23. Navy: 65
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 9 by 85.6. Tulane: 17 by 38.6. North Texas: 20 by 85. Cincinnati: 5 by 45.8. Tulsa: 8 by 29.9. Navy: 15 by 47.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
85.6 vs Washington State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Colorado
2012-2015
Opening stop
Houston
2017-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 324 | 39.3 | 11.1 | 324 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 30 | 34.5 | 8.4 | -294 |
| 2018 Postseason | Houston | 868 | 60.9 | 18.7 | 838 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Houston | 868 | 60.9 | 18.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 418 | 55.4 | 23.4 | -450 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with 168 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
168
Primary metric
168 scrimmage yards and 40.8 usage.
#2
Tulane
139
Primary metric
Win with 139 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
139 scrimmage yards and 26.5 usage.
#3
UCLA
100
Primary metric
Loss with 100 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
100 scrimmage yards and 20.4 usage.
#4
Tulsa
90
Primary metric
Win with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
90 scrimmage yards and 23.3 usage.
#5
Rice
74
Primary metric
Win with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 14.8 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Houston
868 primary output · 60.9 efficiency · 18.7 usage
63.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Houston
63.8
868 primary · 60.9 efficiency · 18.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Houston
48.1
418 primary · 55.4 efficiency · 23.4 usage
3
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,640
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Patrick Carr quick answers