Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2016Arizona State
WR • 5'11" • Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Tim White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
68
Solid production for a receiver
Reliability
80
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
70
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
Snapshot
Player Story
Tim White built his college career from 2015 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Santa Clarita, CA wearing No. 12, spending time with Arizona State. The clearest part of Tim White's career was his receiving role:...
Read the storyTim White, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State. Tim White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Arizona State | 12 | 4 | 79 | 2 | 67.8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 12 | 53 | 554 | 7 | 67.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 12 | 56 | 713 | 4 | 85.5 |
Related Context
Tim White played WR for Arizona State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Tim White recorded 65 rushing yards, 1,346 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Arizona State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 713 primary output with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
59.4
Efficiency
81.2
Usage
28
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Arizona: 95. Texas Tech: 40. UTSA: 0. California: 86. USC: 84. UCLA: 123. Colorado: 97. Washington State: 48. Oregon: 0. Utah: 50. Washington: 21. Arizona: 69
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Arizona: 9 by 70.4. Texas Tech: 6 by 44.4. California: 6 by 95.6. USC: 7 by 80. UCLA: 11 by 74.5. Colorado: 5 by 100. Washington State: 3 by 100. Utah: 2 by 100. Washington: 3 by 46.7. Arizona: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Arizona | L 35-56 | — | 4 | 69 | 12.6 | 17.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Washington | L 18-44 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 11/11 | vs Utah | L 26-49 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Oregon | L 35-54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Washington State | L 32-37 | — | 3 | 48 | 11 | 16 | 0 | 40 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Colorado | L 16-40 | — | 5 | 97 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 0 | 44 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-20 | — | 11 | 123 | 9.7 | 11.20 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ USC | L 20-41 | — | 7 | 84 | 10.9 | 12 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs California | W 51-41 | — | 6 | 86 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTSA | W 32-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Texas Tech | W 68-55 | — | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Northern ArizonaHigh volume | W 44-13 | — | 9 | 95 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 20 |
Player Story
Tim White built his college career from 2015 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Santa Clarita, CA wearing No. 12, spending time with Arizona State. The clearest part of Tim White's career was his receiving role: 113 catches, 1,346 receiving yards, 10 touchdowns, and 65 rushing yards across 24 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2015 with Arizona State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 65 rushing yards, 1 tackle, and 1,989 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 24 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Arizona State.
The arc is straightforward: Tim White moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona State
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Arizona State | 633 | 69.4 | 19.5 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 633 | 69.4 | 19.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 713 | 81.2 | 28 | 80 |
#1 Featured game
vs Colorado
Week 6 · W 48-23 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Colorado
Week 7 · L 16-40 · Conference game
97
Receiving Yards
93 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs UCLA
Week 6 · W 23-20 · Conference game
123
Receiving Yards
91.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 74.5 efficiency score.
#4
vs California
Week 4 · W 51-41 · Conference game
86
Receiving Yards
86.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
@ USC
Week 5 · L 20-41 · Conference game
84
Receiving Yards
82.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
713 primary output · 81.2 efficiency · 28 usage
85.5
#2
2015 Postseason · Arizona State
67.8
633 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Arizona State
67.8
633 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.