Usage Score
32.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Tennessee
Preston Williams
WR • 6'4" • 210 lbs • Hampton, GA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Preston Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.5
Consistency
63.7
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
1415161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tennessee • Colorado State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Preston Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado State. Preston Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Colorado State paired 1,345 primary output with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Colorado State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
112.1
Efficiency
79.5
Usage
32.1
Consistency
63.7
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado: 49. Hawai'i: 188. Arkansas: 154. Florida: 106. Unknown: 14. San José State: 67. New Mexico: 93. Boise State: 154. Wyoming: 126. Nevada: 69. Utah State: 77. Air Force: 248
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado: 6 by 54.4. Hawai'i: 9 by 100. Arkansas: 12 by 85.6. Florida: 9 by 78.5. Unknown: 3 by 31.1. San José State: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 9 by 68.9. Boise State: 9 by 100. Wyoming: 10 by 84. Nevada: 7 by 65.7. Utah State: 6 by 85.6. Air Force: 12 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins104.7 · n=3 · -22.5 vs Losses
Losses127.1 · n=8 · +22.5 vs Wins
First Half96.3 · n=6 · -31.5 vs Second Half
Second Half127.8 · n=6 · +31.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 11/22 | @ Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | L 19-27 | — | 12 | 248 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 3 | 58 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Utah State2+ TD | L 24-29 | — | 6 | 77 | 11.9 | 12.80 | 2 | 35 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Nevada | L 10-49 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Wyoming100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-34 | — | 10 | 126 | 11.5 | 12.60 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Boise State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-56 | — | 9 | 154 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs New MexicoHigh volume | W 20-18 | — | 9 | 93 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ San José State2+ TD | W 42-30 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | L 10-48 | — | 9 | 106 | 10.2 | 11.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-27 | — | 12 | 154 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 2 | 31 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Colorado | L 13-45 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 8/25 | vs Hawai'i100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-43 | — | 9 | 188 | 20.9 | 20.90 | 2 | 69 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2014-2016
Opening stop
- 2
Colorado State
2017-2018
Final stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tennessee | 158 | 87.8 | 10.8 | 158 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tennessee | 89 | 71.9 | 17.8 | -69 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | — | -89 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Colorado State | 1,345 | 79.5 | 32.1 | 1,345 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
248
Primary metric
248 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
98
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Hawai'i
188
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
188 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
App State
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Boise State
154
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
1,345 primary output · 79.5 efficiency · 32.1 usage
68.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tennessee
41.8
89 primary · 71.9 efficiency · 17.8 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Tennessee
38.6
158 primary · 87.8 efficiency · 10.8 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9769
Lovejoy · Hampton, GA
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,592
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.