Usage Score
26.6
Player Dossier
2012-2019Oregon
Kirk Merritt
WR • 6'0" • 215 lbs • Destrehan, LA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kirk Merritt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.1
Consistency
62.5
Season Value
62.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Arkansas State
1213141518181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oregon • Arkansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Coastal Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kirk Merritt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Arkansas State. Kirk Merritt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 1,005 primary output with 68.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oregon, Arkansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
67.2
Efficiency
77.1
Usage
26.6
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 43. UNLV: 52. Georgia: 25. Unknown: 131. Troy: 104. Georgia State: 84. Louisiana: 28. Texas State: 40. UL Monroe: 67. Coastal Carolina: 70. Georgia Southern: 41. South Alabama: 121
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 6 by 47.8. UNLV: 4 by 86.7. Georgia: 6 by 27.8. Unknown: 10 by 87.3. Troy: 6 by 100. Georgia State: 9 by 62.2. Louisiana: 2 by 93.3. Texas State: 3 by 88.9. UL Monroe: 6 by 74.4. Coastal Carolina: 7 by 66.7. Georgia Southern: 2 by 100. South Alabama: 9 by 89.6
Split Comparison
Wins59.6 · n=7 · -4.9 vs Losses
Losses64.5 · n=4 · +4.9 vs Wins
First Half73.2 · n=6 · +12.0 vs Second Half
Second Half61.2 · n=6 · -12.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Southern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | vs Florida International | W 34-26 | — | 6 | 43 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 1 | 14 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ South Alabama100 receiving yards · High volume | L 30-34 | — | 9 | 121 | 12.3 | 13.40 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Georgia Southern | W 38-33 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Coastal Carolina2+ TD | W 28-27 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UL Monroe | W 48-41 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Texas State | W 38-14 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Thu 10/17 | vs Louisiana | L 20-37 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Georgia StateHigh volume | L 38-52 | — | 9 | 84 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Troy100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 50-43 | — | 6 | 104 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 10 | 131 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 2 | 43 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Georgia | L 0-55 | — | 6 | 25 | 4.2 | 4.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ UNLV | W 43-17 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 37 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2012-2015
Opening stop
- 2
Arkansas State
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oregon | 61 | 64.4 | 8.6 | 61 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arkansas State | 1,005 | 68.3 | 27 | 944 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 1,005 | 68.3 | 27 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Arkansas State | 806 | 77.1 | 26.6 | -199 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 806 | 77.1 | 26.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Coastal Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180
Primary metric
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
131
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 87.3 efficiency score.
#3
South Alabama
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 89.6 efficiency score.
#4
Texas State
153
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon State
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Arkansas State
1,005 primary output · 68.3 efficiency · 27 usage
64.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Arkansas State
64.3
1,005 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Arkansas State
62.2
806 primary · 77.1 efficiency · 26.6 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,872
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.