Usage Score
10.5
Player Dossier
2015-2017UTSA
Shaq Williams
TE • 6'4" • 255 lbs • Jackson, MS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Shaq Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
72.5
Season Value
53.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTSA
151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shaq Williams, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTSA. Shaq Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
UTSA paired 83 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
27.7
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
10.5
Consistency
72.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 43. Southern Miss: 26. Florida International: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 95.6. Southern Miss: 1 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Losses20 · n=2
First Half34.5 · n=2
All Games27.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Southern Miss
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 158 | 57.9 | 8.9 | 158 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 83 | 80.8 | 10.5 | -75 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
43
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Southern Miss
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
83 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 10.5 usage
53.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
48.2
158 primary · 57.9 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
241
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.