Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2015-2017UTSA
La'Kel Bass
LB • 6'1" • 230 lbs • St. Louis, MO, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
La'Kel Bass shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.3
Consistency
33.1
Season Value
23.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
15161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
La'Kel Bass, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. La'Kel Bass shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 17 primary output with 41 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 35.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
35.3
Usage
11
Consistency
33.1
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 2. Unknown: 0. Texas State: 2. Southern Miss: 2.5. North Texas: 0. Rice: 0.5. UTEP: 0.5. Florida International: 1. UAB: 2. Marshall: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 5 by 20.8. Texas State: 4 by 36.7. Southern Miss: 9 by 62.5. North Texas: 6 by 25. Rice: 8 by 38.3. UTEP: 5 by 25.8. Florida International: 8 by 43.3. UAB: 11 by 65.8. Marshall: 7 by 29.2. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=5 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=5 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half1.2 · n=6 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=5 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 6-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Marshall | W 9-7 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs UAB10+ tackles | L 19-24 | 11 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Florida International | L 7-14 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Rice | W 20-7 | 8 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ North Texas | L 26-29 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Southern MissSplash game | L 29-31 | 9 | 3 | — | 2 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas StateSplash game | W 44-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Baylor | W 17-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 17 | 41 | 12.9 | 17 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 17 | 41 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 10.5 | 35.3 | 11 | -6.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 67.5 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
#3
UAB
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#4
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#5
Texas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · UTSA
17 primary output · 41 efficiency · 12.9 usage
29.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
29.2
17 primary · 41 efficiency · 12.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
23.2
10.5 primary · 35.3 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
155
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.