Usage / Role
24%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2018UTSA
S • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Port Arthur, TX, USA
C.J. Levine shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44 disruption score.
Usage / Role
24%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
36
Developing production for a safety
Reliability
46
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
43
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
C.J. Levine built his college career from 2015 through 2018 as a safety from Port Arthur, TX wearing No. 14, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of C.J. Levine's career was his defensive production: 171...
Read the storyC.J. Levine, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA. C.J. Levine shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 9 | 31 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 20.8 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 46 | 2.5 | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 38.6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 94 | 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 67.4 |
Related Context
C.J. Levine played S for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, C.J. Levine recorded 171 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTSA paired 14.5 primary output with 44 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
18.2
Usage
3.1
Consistency
14.8
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama State: 0. Arizona State: 0. Old Dominion: 1. Southern Miss: 1. Rice: 1. UTEP: 0.5. North Texas: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Texas A&M: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama State: 5 by 20.8. Arizona State: 5 by 20.8. Old Dominion: 0 by 10. Southern Miss: 5 by 30.8. Rice: 5 by 30.8. UTEP: 6 by 30. North Texas: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
30.8 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 35-63 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Texas | W 31-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UTEP | L 49-52 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Rice | W 14-13 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Southern Miss | W 55-32 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Old Dominion | L 19-33 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Arizona State | L 28-32 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Alabama State | W 26-13 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
C.J. Levine built his college career from 2015 through 2018 as a safety from Port Arthur, TX wearing No. 14, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of C.J. Levine's career was his defensive production: 171 tackles, 7.5 tackles for loss, 2 interceptions, and 10 passes defended across 32 career games in the available record. That gives C.J. Levine's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 3.5 | 18.2 | 3.1 | 3.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 5.5 | 22.4 | 5.1 | 2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 14.5 | 44 | 8.8 | 9 |
#1 Featured game
@ Rice
Week 6 · W 20-3 · Conference game
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Havoc Plays
92.8 takeover
4 disruption/tackle impact with 92.8 takeover score.
#2
vs Louisiana Tech
Week 7 · L 3-31 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
64.7 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 64.7 takeover score.
#3
@ Marshall
Week 12 · L 0-23 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
61.7 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#4
@ Southern Miss
Week 8 · L 17-27 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
61.7 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#5
vs Baylor
Week 2 · L 20-37
2
Havoc Plays
57.2 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
14.5 primary output · 44 efficiency · 8.8 usage
67.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
38.6
5.5 primary · 22.4 efficiency · 5.1 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
20.8
3.5 primary · 18.2 efficiency · 3.1 usage
4
Impact games
5
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.