Usage Score
21.8
Player Dossier
2015-2017UTSA
WR • 6'4" • 210 lbs • College Station, TX, USA
Josh Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.8
Efficiency
80.6
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
61.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTSA. Josh Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTSA paired 682 primary output with 88.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
46.5
Efficiency
80.6
Usage
21.8
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 54. Unknown: 16. Texas State: 15. Southern Miss: 101. North Texas: 54. Rice: 66. UTEP: 46. Florida International: 29. UAB: 40. Marshall: 69. Louisiana Tech: 22
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 5 by 72. Unknown: 2 by 53.3. Texas State: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. North Texas: 3 by 100. Rice: 5 by 88. UTEP: 4 by 76.7. Florida International: 3 by 64.4. UAB: 4 by 66.7. Marshall: 5 by 92. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 73.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 6-20 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Marshall | W 9-7 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs UAB | L 19-24 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Florida International | L 7-14 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/29 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Rice | W 20-7 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ North Texas | L 26-29 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Southern Miss100 receiving yards | L 29-31 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas State | W 44-14 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Baylor | W 17-10 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 22 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 682 | 88.9 | 20.4 | 682 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 512 | 80.6 | 21.8 | -170 |
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Miss
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
North Texas
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
682 primary output · 88.9 efficiency · 20.4 usage
68.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
61.5
512 primary · 80.6 efficiency · 21.8 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,194
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Josh Stewart quick answers