Usage Score
7.2
Player Dossier
2015-2016North Texas
Cortney Finney
LB • 5'11" • Bay City, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cortney Finney shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.5
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
15.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Texas
151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cortney Finney, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Texas. Cortney Finney shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
North Texas paired 8.5 primary output with 31.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · North Texas
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
31.5
Usage
7.2
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. SMU: 0. Unknown: 5. Florida: 0. Rice: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0.5. Marshall: 1. Army: 0. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Southern Miss: 1. UTEP: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 8 by 33.3. SMU: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 8 by 83.3. Florida: 5 by 20.8. Rice: 12 by 50. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 30. Marshall: 7 by 39.2. Army: 5 by 20.8. UTSA: 6 by 25. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 29.2. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 6 by 35. UTEP: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=4 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · n=8 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=6 · -0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Army | L 31-38 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTEP | L 24-52 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Southern Miss | W 29-23 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 24-45 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ UTSA | L 17-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Army | W 35-18 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Marshall | W 38-21 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 13-30 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Rice10+ tackles | W 42-35 | 12 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Florida | L 0-32 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 8 | 7 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs SMU | L 21-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | North Texas | 8.5 | 31.5 | 7.2 | 8.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 8.5 | 31.5 | 7.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 70.4 takeover score.
#2
Marshall
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.8 takeover score.
#3
Southern Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 20.8 takeover score.
#4
UTEP
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 19.9 takeover score.
#5
Rice
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 18.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · North Texas
8.5 primary output · 31.5 efficiency · 7.2 usage
15.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · North Texas
15.3
8.5 primary · 31.5 efficiency · 7.2 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · North Texas
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
78
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.