Usage Score
26.5
Player Dossier
2015-2018Bowling Green
Scott Miller
WR • 5'10" • 160 lbs • Barrington, IL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Scott Miller reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.4
Consistency
66.7
Season Value
58
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1515161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Scott Miller, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Scott Miller reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 1,106 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
60.2
Efficiency
76.4
Usage
26.5
Consistency
66.7
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 29. Unknown: 62. Northwestern: 30. Middle Tennessee: 112. Akron: 55. Miami (OH): 18. Ohio: 95. Northern Illinois: 49. Kent State: 13. Buffalo: 108. Toledo: 53. Eastern Michigan: 98
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 2 by 96.7. Unknown: 5 by 82.7. Northwestern: 4 by 50. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 93.3. Akron: 10 by 36.7. Miami (OH): 2 by 60. Ohio: 6 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 43.3. Buffalo: 10 by 72. Toledo: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 81.7
Split Comparison
Wins15.5 · n=2 · -54.4 vs Losses
Losses69.9 · n=9 · +54.4 vs Wins
First Half51 · n=6 · -18.3 vs Second Half
Second Half69.3 · n=6 · +18.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | @ Eastern MichiganHigh volume | L 31-34 | — | 8 | 98 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 11/16 | vs Toledo | L 37-66 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 27 |
| Wed 11/8 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-38 | — | 10 | 108 | 10.3 | 10.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Wed 11/1 | @ Kent State | W 44-16 | — | 2 | 13 | 10 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Northern Illinois | L 17-48 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio | L 30-48 | — | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 69 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-29 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs AkronHigh volume | L 23-34 | — | 10 | 55 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-24 | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Northwestern | L 7-49 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Michigan State | L 10-35 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Bowling Green | 29 | 25.3 | 6.5 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 29 | 25.3 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 968 | 69.3 | 30 | 939 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 722 | 76.4 | 26.5 | -246 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,106 | 82.2 | 32.5 | 384 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178
Primary metric
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
206
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
206 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
166
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
166 receiving yards with a 85.1 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
148
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 89.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1,106 primary output · 82.2 efficiency · 32.5 usage
66.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
58
722 primary · 76.4 efficiency · 26.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
57
968 primary · 69.3 efficiency · 30 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7956
Barrington · Barrington, IL
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,825
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.