Usage Score
19.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Cincinnati
TE • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Folsom, CA, USA
Josiah Deguara reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.6
Efficiency
76.2
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josiah Deguara, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Cincinnati. Josiah Deguara reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 504 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
38.8
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
19.6
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 12. UCLA: 53. Ohio State: 46. Miami (OH): 42. Marshall: 42. UCF: 64. Houston: 22. Tulsa: 24. East Carolina: 76. UConn: 45. South Florida: 10. Memphis: 46. Memphis: 22
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 3 by 26.7. UCLA: 4 by 88.3. Ohio State: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 100. Marshall: 3 by 93.3. UCF: 5 by 85.3. Houston: 2 by 73.3. Tulsa: 2 by 80. East Carolina: 2 by 100. UConn: 5 by 60. South Florida: 2 by 33.3. Memphis: 4 by 76.7. Memphis: 2 by 73.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/2 | vs Boston College | W 38-6 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Memphis | L 24-29 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Memphis | L 24-34 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ South Florida | W 20-17 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UConn2+ TD | W 48-3 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ East Carolina | W 46-43 | — | 2 | 76 | 38 | 38 | 1 | 73 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Tulsa | W 24-13 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Houston | W 38-23 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs UCF | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Marshall | W 52-14 | — | 3 | 42 | 14.7 | 14 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Miami (OH) | W 35-13 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Ohio State | L 0-42 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs UCLA | W 24-14 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 47 | 58.9 | 6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 98 | 62.2 | 9.7 | 51 |
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 468 | 65.9 | 19.2 | 370 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 468 | 65.9 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 504 | 76.2 | 19.6 | 36 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 504 | 76.2 | 19.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Cincinnati
504 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 19.6 usage
66.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Cincinnati
66.5
504 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 19.6 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
55.5
468 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 19.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7952
Folsom · Folsom, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,117
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Josiah Deguara quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit