Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2016-2019Cincinnati
Rashad Medaris
WR • 5'11" • 178 lbs • Indianapolis, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Rashad Medaris reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.9
Consistency
43.8
Season Value
53.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rashad Medaris, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati. Rashad Medaris reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 472 primary output with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
29.5
Efficiency
71.9
Usage
15.4
Consistency
43.8
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 0. UCLA: 23. Ohio State: 3. Miami (OH): 11. Marshall: 28. UCF: 25. Houston: 121. Tulsa: 37. UConn: 20. Temple: 19. Memphis: 39. Memphis: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 2 by 76.7. Ohio State: 1 by 20. Miami (OH): 1 by 73.3. Marshall: 2 by 93.3. UCF: 3 by 55.6. Houston: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 61.7. UConn: 2 by 66.7. Temple: 2 by 63.3. Memphis: 3 by 86.7. Memphis: 2 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins31.6 · n=9 · +8.2 vs Losses
Losses23.3 · n=3 · -8.2 vs Wins
First Half15 · n=6 · -29 vs Second Half
Second Half44 · n=6 · +29 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/2 | vs Boston College | W 38-6 | — | — | — | 24 | — | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Memphis | L 24-29 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Memphis | L 24-34 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Temple | W 15-13 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UConn | W 48-3 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Tulsa | W 24-13 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Houston100 receiving yards | W 38-23 | — | 3 | 121 | 40.3 | 40.30 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs UCF | W 27-24 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Marshall | W 52-14 | — | 2 | 28 | 9.7 | 14 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Miami (OH) | W 35-13 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Ohio State | L 0-42 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs UCLA | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 61 | 67.8 | 8.7 | 61 |
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 472 | 75.9 | 15.3 | 411 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 472 | 75.9 | 15.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 354 | 71.9 | 15.4 | -118 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 354 | 71.9 | 15.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121
Primary metric
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
472 primary output · 75.9 efficiency · 15.3 usage
63.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · Cincinnati
63.2
472 primary · 75.9 efficiency · 15.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Cincinnati
53.1
354 primary · 71.9 efficiency · 15.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
887
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.