Usage Score
8.1
Player Dossier
2015-2016Texas A&M
Justin Evans
DB • 6'1" • Wiggins, MS, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Justin Evans shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
40.9
Consistency
41
Season Value
27.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
15151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Evans, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M. Justin Evans shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 17 primary output with 40.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
40.9
Usage
8.1
Consistency
41
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 2. UCLA: 3. Unknown: 2. Auburn: 1. Arkansas: 1. South Carolina: 1. Tennessee: 4. Alabama: 1. New Mexico State: 0. Mississippi State: 2. Ole Miss: 0. UTSA: 0. LSU: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 2 by 28.3. UCLA: 8 by 63.3. Unknown: 5 by 40.8. Auburn: 12 by 60. Arkansas: 8 by 43.3. South Carolina: 4 by 26.7. Tennessee: 11 by 85.8. Alabama: 4 by 26.7. New Mexico State: 3 by 12.5. Mississippi State: 11 by 65.8. Ole Miss: 12 by 50. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=7 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=5 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half2 · n=7 · +1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · -1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
85.8 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Kansas State | L 28-33 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs LSU | L 39-54 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTSA | W 23-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Ole Miss10+ tackles | L 28-29 | 12 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Mississippi State10+ tackles · Splash game | L 28-35 | 11 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs New Mexico State | W 52-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Alabama | L 14-33 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee10+ tackles · Splash game | W 45-38 | 11 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ South Carolina | W 24-13 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Arkansas | W 45-24 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn10+ tackles | W 29-16 | 12 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLASplash game | W 31-24 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1 | 10 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1 | 10 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 17 | 40.9 | 8.1 | 16 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 17 | 40.9 | 8.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.5 takeover score.
#2
LSU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
UCLA
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#4
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
17 primary output · 40.9 efficiency · 8.1 usage
27.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
27.4
17 primary · 40.9 efficiency · 8.1 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Texas A&M
20.4
1 primary · 10 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
87
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.