Usage Score
7
Player Dossier
2013-2021Texas A&M
Richard Moore
LB • 6'0" • 226 lbs • Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Richard Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.3
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
12.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · SMU
1314151618192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Richard Moore, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · SMU. Richard Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
SMU paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · SMU
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
20.3
Usage
7
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. North Texas: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. TCU: 0. South Florida: 1. Tulane: 1. Houston: 2. Memphis: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Tulsa: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 50.8. North Texas: 3 by 12.5. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. TCU: 2 by 8.3. South Florida: 6 by 35. Tulane: 3 by 22.5. Houston: 6 by 45. Memphis: 2 by 8.3. Cincinnati: 2 by 8.3. Tulsa: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.4 · n=5 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=4 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=5 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=5 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Tulsa | L 31-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-48 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Memphis | L 25-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Houston | L 37-44 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/21 | vs Tulane | W 55-26 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs South Florida | W 41-17 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ TCU | W 42-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 39-37 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs North Texas | W 35-12 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2013-2016
Opening stop
- 2
SMU
2018-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162018201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4 | 16.1 | 2.9 | 4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 18.5 | 46.7 | 13.9 | 14.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 2 | 27.5 | 4.8 | -16.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | -2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | SMU | 7 | 20.3 | 7 | 7 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#3
Navy
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.5 takeover score.
#4
Tulane
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.6 takeover score.
#5
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · SMU
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
34.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · SMU
31.3
18.5 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 13.9 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · SMU
25
2 primary · 27.5 efficiency · 4.8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
5
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
157
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.