Usage Score
13.6
Player Dossier
2015-2017Texas A&M
Damion Ratley
WR • 6'3" • 190 lbs • Yoakum, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Damion Ratley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.7
Consistency
68.3
Season Value
68.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
1516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Damion Ratley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Texas A&M. Damion Ratley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 694 primary output with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
57.8
Efficiency
91.7
Usage
13.6
Consistency
68.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 91. Unknown: 13. Louisiana: 86. Arkansas: 57. South Carolina: 40. Alabama: 32. Florida: 72. Mississippi State: 7. Auburn: 82. New Mexico: 58. Ole Miss: 111. LSU: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 4 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 86.7. Louisiana: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 4 by 66.7. Alabama: 1 by 100. Florida: 2 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 46.7. Auburn: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 100. Ole Miss: 5 by 100. LSU: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins70.7 · n=6 · +19.3 vs Losses
Losses51.4 · n=5 · -19.3 vs Wins
First Half53.2 · n=6 · -9.3 vs Second Half
Second Half62.5 · n=6 · +9.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wake Forest
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Wake Forest | L 52-55 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/26 | @ LSU | L 21-45 | — | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 1 | 45 |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Ole Miss100 receiving yards | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 1 | 47 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs New Mexico2+ TD | W 55-14 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Auburn2+ TD | L 27-42 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 2 | 62 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Mississippi State | L 14-35 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Florida | W 19-17 | — | 2 | 72 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Alabama | L 19-27 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs South Carolina | W 24-17 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Arkansas | W 50-43 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Louisiana | W 45-21 | — | 2 | 86 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 76 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 200 | 80.2 | 9.8 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 26 | 70 | 3.5 | -174 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 26 | 70 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 694 | 91.7 | 13.6 | 668 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 694 | 91.7 | 13.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nevada
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
20
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
694 primary output · 91.7 efficiency · 13.6 usage
68.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Texas A&M
68.4
694 primary · 91.7 efficiency · 13.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
42.3
200 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 9.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
920
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.