Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2015-2017Purdue
Anthony Mahoungou
WR • 6'3" • 210 lbs • Paris, France
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Anthony Mahoungou reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.6
Consistency
52
Season Value
62.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Purdue
15161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Mahoungou, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Purdue. Anthony Mahoungou reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Purdue paired 678 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
56.5
Efficiency
83.6
Usage
14.7
Consistency
52
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 118. Louisville: 33. Ohio: 51. Missouri: 35. Michigan: 24. Minnesota: 76. Wisconsin: 34. Rutgers: 47. Nebraska: 12. Northwestern: 25. Iowa: 135. Indiana: 88
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 6 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 55. Ohio: 2 by 100. Missouri: 3 by 77.8. Michigan: 1 by 100. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 4 by 56.7. Rutgers: 4 by 78.3. Nebraska: 1 by 80. Northwestern: 3 by 55.6. Iowa: 7 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins83.8 · n=6 · +54.7 vs Losses
Losses29.2 · n=6 · -54.7 vs Wins
First Half56.2 · n=6 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half56.8 · n=6 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 38-35 | — | 6 | 118 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 2 | 38 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Indiana | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 88 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 24-15 | — | 7 | 135 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 2 | 42 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Northwestern | L 13-23 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Nebraska | L 24-25 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Rutgers | L 12-14 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Wisconsin | L 9-17 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 76 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Michigan | L 10-28 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Missouri | W 35-3 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Ohio | W 44-21 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Louisville | L 28-35 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 93 | 66.8 | 11.3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 99 | 46.3 | 9 | 6 |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 678 | 83.6 | 14.7 | 579 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 678 | 83.6 | 14.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135
Primary metric
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northwestern
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 51.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Purdue
678 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 14.7 usage
62.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
62.6
678 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
39.2
93 primary · 66.8 efficiency · 11.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
870
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.